Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.D. Codified Laws § 16-13-31

Panel not invalidated by irregularity--Dismissal of panel after misfeasance or malfeasance

Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case Nebraska Electric Generation & Transmission Coop., Inc. v. Markus (1976)

Most recently applied in 536 F. Supp. 2d 1070 - Whitepipe v. Weber (November 2007)

Source: SL 1935, ch 85, § 12; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 32.1012; SL 1972, ch 125, § 21; SL 2003, ch 118, § 10; SL 2015, ch 118, § 3.

How often courts cite this section

1976198019902000200710
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

No irregularity or omission upon the part of the state court administrator's office or of any officer, in the performance of any duty imposed by this chapter, serves to invalidate the panel of grand or petit jurors selected unless it shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court for which the panel was drawn that there was such misfeasance or malfeasance as would tend to deprive some litigant or person charged with crime of a substantial right, in which event the court may dismiss any or all members of the panel from the trial of such case or the consideration of such matter or for the term and may make such order respecting the drawing of additional names from the list or a new panel or a special venire as the court may deem proper.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.