Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-27-12.1

Supervision of probationers--Performance of special conditions--Payment of costs

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case State v. Orr (2015)

Most recently applied in State v. Orr (November 2015)

Source: SDC 1939, § 13.5304 as added by SL 1955, ch 31, § 2; SL 1964, ch 33, § 6; SDCL, § 23-57-10; SL 1977, ch 198, § 10; SL 1981, ch 187; SL 2006, ch 123, § 12.

How often courts cite this section

199320002010201520
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Upon receipt of an order that a defendant has been placed on probation to the court service department, the chief court services officer shall immediately assign the defendant to a court services officer for probation supervision.

All such probationers shall cooperate fully with the court services officer and comply with all directives thereby issued in their regard. If the sentencing judge has provided special conditions, including limited areas of residence or community access, required participation in treatment, enhanced reporting requirements, and use of electronic monitoring or global positioning units, for either a probationer or one released on a suspended sentence, then such person shall comply with such special conditions, and the court services officer is hereby charged with the responsibility for effecting compliance with such conditions.

Whenever the sentencing judge assesses probation costs as a condition of probation, the costs shall be paid to the clerk of the court who shall forward such costs on a monthly basis to the county treasurer for deposit in the county general fund.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.