Public-domain · open source

S.D. Codified Laws § 26-11A-16

Finding of violation or frustration of purpose--Continuance of aftercare

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Christina A. v. Bloomberg (2000)

Most recently applied in Christina A. v. Bloomberg (July 2000)

Source: SL 1996, ch 172, § 66.

If the member of the Board of Pardons and Paroles is satisfied that the terms and conditions of aftercare have been violated or that the purposes and objects of aftercare are not being served:

(1) The juvenile's aftercare supervision may be revoked and the juvenile may be placed in a program or service authorized in § 26-11A-9; or

(2) The juvenile may be released to continue aftercare supervision with or without changing the terms and conditions of the juvenile's aftercare supervision.

If the member of the board is not satisfied that the terms and conditions of aftercare have been violated or that the purposes and objects of aftercare are not being served the member of the board shall release the juvenile to continue aftercare supervision.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.