Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

S.D. Codified Laws § 35-2-10

Violation as ground for revocation or suspension of license--Multiple licenses

Applied in 8 court decisions — leading case Hanig v. City of Winner (2005)

Most recently applied in Hanig v. City of Winner (January 2005)

Source: SDC 1939, § 5.0104; SL 1971, ch 211, § 18; revised pursuant to SL 1972, ch 15, § 4; SL 1993, ch 264; SL 2008, ch 37, § 148; SL 2010, ch 180, § 14; SL 2015, ch 196, § 25,…

How often courts cite this section

198019902000200520
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The secretary, in compliance with chapter 1-26, may revoke or suspend any license issued under this title upon proof of violation by the licensee, by the licensee's agents or employees, or by the manager or contractual operators of retail establishments and their agents or employees operating under a county or municipal license, of any of the following:

(1) Any provision of this title;

(2) Any rule promulgated pursuant to this title; or

(3) Any ordinance or regulation relevant to alcoholic beverage control adopted by the political subdivision issuing the license.

For any licensee with multiple alcoholic beverage licenses for the same premises, upon suspension or revocation of any license pursuant to this title, the licensee shall cease operation under all alcoholic beverage licenses held by the licensee for the same premises for the same period as the suspension or revocation.

Official source: South Dakota Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Dakota statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.