For purposes of this part, a new rule of constitutional criminal law is announced if the result is not dictated by precedent existing at the time the petitioner's conviction became final and application of the rule was susceptible to debate among reasonable minds. A new rule of constitutional criminal law shall not be applied retroactively in a post-conviction proceeding unless the new rule places primary, private individual conduct beyond the power of the criminal law-making authority to proscribe or requires the observance of fairness safeguards that are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-122
Interpretation
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case David Keen v. State of Tennessee (2012)
Most recently applied in Derrick Brandon Bush v. State of Tennessee (January 2014)
Acts 1995, ch. 207, § 1; T.C.A. § 40-30-222.
Current official text: Tennessee Code (LexisNexis). Digitized from the UniCourt Code Improvement Commission public-domain capture. Reproduced from public-domain Tennessee statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.