Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.101

PREFILING ORDER; CONTEMPT

Applied in 16 court decisions — leading case Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc. (2006)

Most recently applied in Paul E. Nunu v. Nancy Nunu Risk and Charles L. Nunu (January 2019)

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 806, Sec. 1, eff

How often courts cite this section

20042010201930
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) A court may, on its own motion or the motion of any party, enter an order prohibiting a person from filing, pro se, a new litigation in a court to which the order applies under this section without permission of the appropriate local administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) to file the litigation if the court finds, after notice and hearing as provided by Subchapter B, that the person is a vexatious litigant.

(b) A person who disobeys an order under Subsection (a) is subject to contempt of court.

(c) A litigant may appeal from a prefiling order entered under Subsection (a) designating the person a vexatious litigant.

(d) A prefiling order entered under Subsection (a) by a justice or constitutional county court applies only to the court that entered the order.

(e) A prefiling order entered under Subsection (a) by a district court, a statutory county court, or the business court applies to each court in this state.

Official source: Texas Constitution and Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Texas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.