(a) A court may not change the substantive provisions of an order to be clarified under this subchapter.
(b) A substantive change made by a clarification order is not enforceable.
SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE NOT ENFORCEABLE
Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case Dickens v. Willis (1997)
Most recently applied in In the Interest of R.F.G. (April 2009)
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
(a) A court may not change the substantive provisions of an order to be clarified under this subchapter.
(b) A substantive change made by a clarification order is not enforceable.
Official source: Texas Constitution and Statutes. Reproduced from public-domain Texas statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.