Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Utah Code § 58-60-113

Evidentiary privilege

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case State v. Gomez (2002)

Most recently applied in State v. Gomez (December 2002)

Enacted by Chapter 32, 1994 General Session

How often courts cite this section

19992000200210
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Evidentiary privilege for mental health therapists regarding admissibility of any confidential communication in administrative, civil, or criminal proceedings is in accordance with Rule 506 of the Utah Rules of Evidence.

Official source: Utah State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Utah statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.