Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 10.43.040

Foreign conviction or acquittal.

Applied in 19 court decisions — leading case 114 Wash. 2d 802 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Cook (1990)

Most recently applied in 181 Wash. App. 201 - State v. Miller (May 2014)

2010 c 8 s 1042; 1999 c 141 s 1; 1909 c 249 s 19; RRS s 2271.

How often courts cite this section

1983199020002010201430
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Whenever, upon the trial of any person for a crime, it appears that the offense was committed in another state or country, under such circumstances that the courts of this state had jurisdiction thereof, and that the defendant has already been acquitted or convicted upon the merits, in a judicial proceeding conducted under the criminal laws of such state or country, founded upon the act or omission with respect to which he or she is upon trial, such former acquittal or conviction is a sufficient defense. Nothing in this section affects or prevents a prosecution in a court of this state of any person who has received administrative or nonjudicial punishment, civilian or military, in another state or country based upon the same act or omission.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.