Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 36.70A.172

Critical areas—Designation and protection—Best available science to be used.

Applied in 32 court decisions — leading case Heal v. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD. (1999)

Most recently applied in Futurewise v. Snohomish County (July 2019)

2010 c 211 s 3; 1995 c 347 s 105.

How often courts cite this section

199920002010201960
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, counties and cities shall include the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas. In addition, counties and cities shall give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries.

(2) If it determines that advice from scientific or other experts is necessary or will be of substantial assistance in reaching its decision, the growth management hearings board may retain scientific or other expert advice to assist in reviewing a petition under RCW 36.70A.290 that involves critical areas.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.