The decisions of a boundary review board located in a county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 must be consistent with RCW 36.70A.020, 36.70A.110, and 36.70A.210.
RCW 36.93.157
Decisions to be consistent with growth management act.
Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case 127 Wash. 2d 759 - Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review Board (1995)
Most recently applied in 158 Wash. 2d 545 - Interlake Sporting Ass'n v. Washington State Boundary Review Board (November 2006)
1992 c 162 s 2.
How often courts cite this section
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.