Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 47.42.102

Compensation for removal of signs—Authorized—Applicability.

Known as the Scenic Vistas Act

The act spans §§ 47–47 (29 sections).

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case 92 Wash. 2d 905 - Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of Seattle (1979)

Most recently applied in 110 Wash. App. 204 - Horan v. City of Federal Way (February 2002)

1975 1st ex.s. c 271 s 2; 1971 ex.s. c 62 s 12.

How often courts cite this section

1973198019902000200210
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, just compensation shall be paid upon the removal of any sign (pursuant to the provisions of chapter 47.42 RCW), lawfully erected under state law, which is visible from the main traveled way of the interstate system or the primary system.

(2) Such compensation shall be paid for the following:

(a) The taking from the owner of such sign, display, or device of all right, title, leasehold, and interest in such sign, display, or device; and

(b) The taking from the owner of the real property on which the sign, display, or device is located, of the right to erect and maintain such signs, displays, and devices thereon.

(3) In no event, however, shall compensation be paid for the taking or removal of signs adjacent to the interstate system and the scenic system which became subject to removal pursuant to chapter 96, Laws of 1961 as amended by section 55, chapter 3, Laws of 1963 ex. sess. prior to May 10, 1971.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.