Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 5.28.060

Affirmation equivalent to oath.

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Stiley v. Block (1996)

Most recently applied in Stiley v. Block (October 1996)

2 H

Whenever an oath is required, an affirmation, as prescribed in RCW 5.28.050 is to be deemed equivalent thereto, and a false affirmation is to be deemed perjury, equally with a false oath.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.