Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 52.02.020

Districts authorized—Health clinic services.

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Babcock v. Mason County Fire Dist. No. 6 (2001)

Most recently applied in 164 Wash. App. 740 - Johnson v. State (November 2011)

2021 c 19 s 1; 2020 c 94 s 1; 2010 c 136 s 1; 2005 c 281 s 1; 2003 c 309 s 1; 1991 c 360 s 10; 1984 c 230 s 1; 1979 ex.s. c 179 s 5; 1959 c 237 s 1; 1947 c 254 s 1; 1945 c 162 s…

How often courts cite this section

20002010201120
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) Fire protection districts for the provision of fire prevention services, fire suppression services, emergency medical services, and for the protection of life and property are authorized to be established as provided in this title.

(2) In addition to other services authorized under this section, fire protection districts that share a common border with Canada and are surrounded on three sides by water or are bounded on the north by Bremerton, on the west by Mason county, on the south by Pierce county, and on the east by the Puget Sound or are in Pierce county and surrounded by Case Inlet, Drayton Passage, Pitt Passage, and Carr Inlet, may also establish or participate in the provision of health clinic services.

(3) Fire protection districts may provide training, expend resources, and enter into interlocal agreements to mitigate the injuries and reduce the level of harm and occurrence in calls they respond to. Examples of trainings are those that may directly or indirectly address worker and workplace safety, teach first aid, prevent injuries, and reduce industrial-related accidents.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.