Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 7.04A.110

Appointment of arbitrator—Service as a neutral arbitrator.

Applied in 7 court decisions — leading case Scott Woodward v. Emeritus Corporation (2016)

Most recently applied in Sarah Gosney, Res/cross-apps. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Apps/cross-res. (May 2018)

2005 c 433 s 11.

How often courts cite this section

20082010201820
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(1) If the parties to an agreement to arbitrate agree on a method for appointing an arbitrator, that method must be followed, unless the method fails. If the parties have not agreed on a method, the agreed method fails, or an arbitrator appointed fails or is unable to act and a successor has not been appointed, the court, on motion of a party to the arbitration proceeding, shall appoint the arbitrator. The arbitrator so appointed has all the powers of an arbitrator designated in the agreement to arbitrate or appointed under the agreed method.

(2) An arbitrator who has a known, direct, and material interest in the outcome of the arbitration proceeding or a known, existing, and substantial relationship with a party may not serve as a neutral arbitrator.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.