Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 7.52.480

Apportionment of costs.

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco Inc. (1997)

Most recently applied in Certification from United States District Court for Western District of Washington In Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Asarco Inc. (April 1997)

1923 c 9 s 1; Code 1881 s 599; 1877 p 124 s 604; 1869 p 142 s 553; RRS s 885.

The cost of partition, including fees of referees and other disbursements including reasonable attorney fees to be fixed by the court and in case the land is ordered sold, costs of an abstract of title, shall be paid by the parties respectively entitled to share in the lands divided, in proportion to their respective interests therein, and may be included and specified in the decree. In that case there shall be a lien on the several shares, and the decree may be enforced by execution against the parties separately. When, however, a litigation arises between some of the parties only, the court may require the expense of such litigation to be paid by the parties thereto, or any of them.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.