Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

RCW 70.38.015

Declaration of public policy.

Known as the State Health Planning and Resources Development Act

The act spans §§ 70–70 (27 sections).

Applied in 20 court decisions — leading case 1998-1 v. Dar P Kottle

Most recently applied in Providence Physician Services Co. v. Department of Health (November 2016)

2007 c 259 s 55; 1989 1st ex.s. c 9 s 601; 1983 c 235 s 1; 1980 c 139 s 1; 1979 ex.s. c 161 s 1.

How often courts cite this section

198920002010201630
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

It is declared to be the public policy of this state:

(1) That strategic health planning efforts must be supported by appropriately tailored regulatory activities that can effectuate the goals and principles of the statewide health resources strategy developed pursuant to chapter 43.370 RCW. The implementation of the strategy can promote, maintain, and assure the health of all citizens in the state, provide accessible health services, health manpower, health facilities, and other resources while controlling increases in costs, and recognize prevention as a high priority in health programs. Involvement in health planning from both consumers and providers throughout the state should be encouraged;

(2) That the certificate of need program is a component of a health planning regulatory process that is consistent with the statewide health resources strategy and public policy goals that are clearly articulated and regularly updated;

(3) That the development and maintenance of adequate health care information, statistics and projections of need for health facilities and services is essential to effective health planning and resources development;

(4) That the development of nonregulatory approaches to health care cost containment should be considered, including the strengthening of price competition; and

(5) That health planning should be concerned with public health and health care financing, access, and quality, recognizing their close interrelationship and emphasizing cost control of health services, including cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis.

Official source: Washington State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Washington statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.