Remedy and penalty for certain violations
Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case Danelle Duncan v. Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc. (2022)
Most recently applied in Danelle Duncan v. Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc. (January 2022)
1971 c. 239.
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
A person who commits a violation to which this section applies is liable to the customer in an amount equal to:
(1) One hundred dollars; and (2) The actual damages, including any incidental and consequential damages, sustained by the customer by reason of the violation.
Official source: Wisconsin State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Wisconsin statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.