Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Wis. Stat. § 781.01

Extraordinary remedy as final judgment or provisional remedy

Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case 219 Wis. 2d 615 - State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz (1998)

Most recently applied in 351 Wis. 2d 1 - Thomas D. Nowell v. City of Wausau (November 2013)

1981 c. 289.

How often courts cite this section

199520002010201310
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

The remedy available by a writ of mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, certiorari or habeas corpus may be granted by the final judgment or allowed as a provisional remedy in an action or proceeding. The use of a writ is not necessary. This section does not alter the nature of any extraordinary remedy or the scope of the proceedings, including without limitation the relief available, discovery, the availability of jury trial and the burden of proof.

Official source: Wisconsin State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Wisconsin statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.