In any civil or criminal action or proceeding, any writing proved to the satisfaction of the judge of a court of record in an in-camera hearing to be in the handwriting of the person who is alleged to have written it, whether or not made in the ordinary course of business, may, if the court further finds that its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect, be admitted into evidence for the purpose of making a comparison with a disputed writing on the issue of whether or not the disputed writing is genuine. The authenticity of each writing shall be finally determined by the trier of fact.
W. Va. Code § 57-2-1
Handwriting analysis
Applied in 1 court decision — leading case SER Margaret L. Workman v. Mitch Carmichael, as President of the Senate (2018)
Most recently applied in SER Margaret L. Workman v. Mitch Carmichael, as President of the Senate (October 2018)
Official source: West Virginia Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain West Virginia statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.