United States Reports
606 volumes · 104,521 opinions
4,420 opinions in United States Reports with a Wikipedia-sourced synopsis — the cases notable enough that someone wrote an encyclopedia article about them.
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc. (1986)476 U.S. 858
East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc., 476 U.S. 858 (1986), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of products liability under maritime law. The Court held that a manufacturer cannot be held liable in tort for purely economic losses resulting from a defective product that causes damage only to itself and not to persons or other property.
- Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Public Utilities Commission of California (1986)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional475 U.S. 1
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission, 475 U.S. 1 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a dispute over newsletters that the San Francisco–based privately owned public utility Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) had included with its monthly bills to customers. The special interest group Toward Utility Rate Normalization (TURN) sued PG&E, arguing that the extra space in the billing envelope taken by the newsletters constituted a form of political speech whose cost the public should not have to bear.
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. (1986)475 U.S. 41
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that localities may impose regulations prohibiting adult theaters from operating within certain areas, finding that the regulation in question was a content-neutral time/place/manner restriction. The specific restriction at issue was established by Renton, Washington, and prohibited adult theaters within 1,000 feet from any residential zone, single- or multiple-family dwelling, church, park, or school.
- New York v. Class (1986)475 U.S. 106
New York v. Class, 475 U.S. 106 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment when police look for a vehicle identification numbers after they have developed reasonable suspicion.
- Nix v. Whiteside (1986)475 U.S. 157
Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the effective assistance of counsel during a criminal trial.
- Whitley v. Albers (1986)475 U.S. 312
Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that prison staff are not generally liable for the use of excessive force during prison disturbances such as a hostage situation where a guard is taken.
- Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati (1986)475 U.S. 469
Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified a previous case, Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978), and established that municipalities can be held liable even for a single decision that is improperly made.
- Goldman v. Weinberger (1986)475 U.S. 503
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a Jewish Air Force officer was denied the right to wear a yarmulke when in uniform on the grounds that the Free Exercise Clause applies less strictly to the military than to ordinary citizens.
- Holbrook v. Flynn (1986)475 U.S. 560
Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U.S. 560 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to an impartial jury.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation (1986)475 U.S. 574
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986), was an antitrust case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. It raised the standard for surviving summary judgment to unambiguous evidence that tends to exclude an innocent interpretation. Specifically, the issue was whether there was a horizontal "agreement" between Matsushita Electric and other Japanese television manufacturers. The Court held that the evidence must tend to exclude the possibility of independent action to be sufficient to survive summary judgment.
- Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los Angeles (1986)475 U.S. 608
Golden State Transit Corp v City of Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608 (1986), is a US labor law case, concerning the scope of federal preemption against state law for labor rights.
- Michigan v. Jackson (1986)Overruled (2009)475 U.S. 625
Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel in a police interrogation. In a decision written by Justice Stevens, the Court held that once an accused individual has claimed a right to counsel at a plea hearing or other court proceeding, a waiver of that right during later police questioning would be invalid unless the accused individual initiated the communication.
Overruled by Montejo v. Louisiana (2009) - Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps (1986)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional475 U.S. 767
Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case decided April 21, 1986.
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie (1986)475 U.S. 813
Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie, 475 U.S. 813 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the Due Process Clause requires state supreme court justices to recuse themselves from cases in which they have a direct, personal, substantial, and pecuniary interest in the outcome.
- Vasquez v. Hillery (1986)474 U.S. 254
Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case, which held that a defendant's conviction must be reversed if members of their race were systematically excluded from the grand jury that indicted them, even if they were convicted following an otherwise fair trial.
- Wainwright v. Greenfield (1986)474 U.S. 284
Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court reversed the lower court's finding and overturned the petitioner's conviction, on the grounds that it was fundamentally unfair for the prosecutor to comment during the court proceedings on the petitioner's silence invoked as a result of a Miranda warning.
- United States v. Lane (1986)Altered precedent474 U.S. 438
United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that misjoinder under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b) is subject to harmless error analysis, and it is not reversible error per se.
- Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind (1986)474 U.S. 481
Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481 (1986), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Establishment Clause did not prevent the state of Washington from providing financial vocational assistance to a blind man who sought to study at a Christian college to become a pastor, missionary, or youth pastor. The Court ruled that the Establishment Clause does not prevent financial assistance from a state vocational rehabilitation program from being used for religious instruction.
- KENTUCKY v. INDIANA Et Al. (1985)9–0474 U.S. 1
This is a list of all United States Supreme Court cases from volume 474 of the United States Reports:
- Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union (1985)474 U.S. 3
Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. Transportation Union, 474 U.S. 3 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Secretary of Labor has unreviewable discretion to withdraw a citation charging an employer with violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
- Heath v. Alabama (1985)474 U.S. 82
Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 (1985), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that, because of the doctrine of "dual sovereignty" (the concept that the United States and each state possess sovereignty – a consequence of federalism), the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution does not prohibit one state from prosecuting and punishing somebody for an act of which they had already been convicted of and sentenced for in another state. This decision is one of several that holds that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid the U.S. federal government and a state government, or the governments of more than one state, from prosecuting the same individual separately for the same illegal act.
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc. (1985)474 U.S. 121
United States v. Riverside Bayview, 474 U.S. 121 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging the scope of federal regulatory powers over waterways as pertaining to the definition of "waters of the United States" as written in the Clean Water Act of 1972. The Court ruled unanimously that the government does have the power to control intrastate wetlands as waters of the United States. This ruling was effectively revised in Rapanos v. United States (2006), in which the Court adopted a very narrow interpretation of "navigable waters."
- Marek v. Chesny (1985)473 U.S. 1
This is a list of all United States Supreme Court cases from volume 473 of the United States Reports:
- Pattern Makers' League v. National Labor Relations Board (1985)473 U.S. 95
Pattern Makers League of North America v. NLRB, 473 U.S. 95 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the NLRB's policy of affording employees a right to resign without paying union dues is not facially unlawful. The court deferred to the NLRB's expert judgment rather than come to a firm conclusion. In conjunction with NLRB v. Granite State Joint Board, this case supersedes the reasoning of Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck.
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City (1985)Overruled (2019)473 U.S. 172
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that limited access to federal court for plaintiffs alleging uncompensated takings of private property under the Fifth Amendment. In June 2019, this case was overruled in part by the Court's decision in Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania.
Overruled by Knick v. Township Of Scott (2019) - Dowling v. United States (1985)473 U.S. 207
Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case that discussed whether copies of copyrighted works could be regarded as stolen property for the purposes of a law which criminalized the interstate transportation of property that had been "stolen, converted or taken by fraud" and holding that they could not be so regarded under that law.
- Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon (1985)473 U.S. 234
Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding Congress' power to abrogate the Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity of the states.
- Aguilar v. Felton Secretary United States Department of Education (1985)Overruled (1997)473 U.S. 402
Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that New York City's program that sent public school teachers into parochial schools to provide remedial education to disadvantaged children pursuant to Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 necessitated an excessive entanglement of church and state and violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Overruled by Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York (1997) - City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center (1985)Held municipal or local ordinance unconstitutional473 U.S. 432
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432 (1985), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving discrimination against intellectually disabled people.
- United States v. Montoya De Hernandez (1985)473 U.S. 531
United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985), was a U.S. Supreme Court case regarding the Fourth Amendment's border search exception and balloon swallowing.
- Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc (1985)473 U.S. 614
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning arbitration of antitrust claims. The Court heard the case on appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which had ruled that the arbitration clause in a Puerto Rican car dealer's franchise agreement was broad enough to reach its antitrust claim. By a 5–3 margin it upheld the lower court, requiring that the dealer arbitrate its claim before a panel in Tokyo, as stipulated in the contract. Justice Harry Blackmun wrote for the majority that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was broad enough to require arbitration of statutory claims as well as contractual ones, extending a recent line of Court decisions favorable to arbitration.
- United States v. Bagley (1985)473 U.S. 667
United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that established the standard for materiality under Brady v. Maryland.
- Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe (1985)473 U.S. 753
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe, 473 U.S. 753 (1985), was a case appealed to the US Supreme Court by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The Supreme Court reversed the previous decisions in the District Court and the Court of Appeals stating that the exclusive right to hunt, fish, and gather roots, berries, and seeds on the lands reserved to the Klamath Tribe by the 1864 Treaty was not intended to survive as a special right to be free of state regulation in the ceded lands that were outside the reservation after the 1901 Agreement.
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (1985)473 U.S. 788
Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 473 U.S. 788 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case on the First Amendment and the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC). The court ruled that excluding 'activist' organizations from those eligible to receive donations through the CFC system is not a violation of the First Amendment.
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc. (1985)472 U.S. 1
This is a list of all United States Supreme Court cases from volume 472 of the United States Reports:
- Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional472 U.S. 38
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding on the issue of silent school prayer.
- Caldwell v. Mississippi (1985)472 U.S. 320
Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a prosecutor in a capital case must never tell the jury that jurors are not deciding whether the defendant will die. To do so violates the Eighth Amendment. The Court vacated the death sentence of the petitioner, Bobby Caldwell.
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell (1985)472 U.S. 400
Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400 (1985), is a US labor law case before the United States Supreme Court concerning age discrimination.
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. Koller (1985)472 U.S. 424
Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that to fall within the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule, an order must conclusively determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment. This case stands for the final judgment rule itself: a party must ordinarily raise all of their appellate issues under one and only one appeal following a final judgment.
- Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill (1985)472 U.S. 445
Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that due process required that prison disciplinary decisions to revoke good-time credits must be supported by "some evidence."
- Maryland v. MacOn (1985)472 U.S. 463
Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985), was a case that involved the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, also regarding First Amendment issues. Baxter Macon, a sales clerk, was charged with the sale of obscene materials after being arrested by a detective not in uniform, who stated that the magazines he purchased in Baxter's store were obscene. The court ruled that the purchase of the magazines was not a seizure, and Macon was found guilty of the sale of obscene materials. The case involves the court analyzing the Fourth Amendment and determining whether the action taken by the detective was a seizure or not, which would determine if the magazines could be used in the trial as evidence.
- McDonald v. Smith (1985)472 U.S. 479
McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the right to petition does not provide absolute immunity to petitioners; it is subject to the same restrictions as other First Amendment rights.
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc. (1985)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional472 U.S. 491
Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., 472 U.S. 491 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that though portions of a law against obscenity and prostitution might be invalid, it would not be invalidated as a whole unless severing unconstitutional provisions would result in an unworkable law.
- Mitchell v. Forsyth (1985)472 U.S. 511
Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding on the issue of immunity of cabinet officers from suits from individuals.
- Aspen Skiing Company v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation (1985)472 U.S. 585
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case that decided whether a dominant firm's unilateral refusal to deal with a competitor could establish a monopolization claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The unanimous Supreme Court agreed with the 10th Circuit that terminating a pro-consumer joint venture without a legitimate business justification could constitute illegal monopolization. However, its decision created an exception to the general rule that firms can decide with whom to do business absent collusion, sparking significant controversy about the appropriate scope of this exception. In a subsequent case, Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V.
- In Re Robert J Snyder (1985)472 U.S. 634
In re Snyder, 472 U.S. 634 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an attorney's curt letter to a court employee, followed by the attorney's refusal to apologize for sending the letter, did not justify suspending the attorney from practicing law in federal court.
- United States v. Albertini (1985)472 U.S. 675
United States v. Albertini, 472 U.S. 675 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case about the First Amendment rights of a man who had been banned from entering a military base and later entered the base where he participated in a protest. According to the court, the base did not become a public forum just because it was holding an open house at the time. The court held that the government's interest in securing military bases justified excluding people who had been ordered not to reenter. This First Amendment holding applied a version of the test from United States v. O'Brien (1968) for content-neutral incidental burdens on speech.
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. (1985)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional472 U.S. 703
Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc., 472 U.S. 703 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute providing employees with an absolute right not to work on their chosen Sabbath violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985)472 U.S. 749
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749 (1985), was a Supreme Court case which held that a credit reporting agency could be liable in defamation if it carelessly relayed (i.e. published) false information that a business had declared bankruptcy when in fact it had not.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts (1985)472 U.S. 797
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (1985), was a conflict of laws case decided by the United States Supreme Court.