United States Reports
606 volumes · 104,521 opinions
4,420 opinions in United States Reports with a Wikipedia-sourced synopsis — the cases notable enough that someone wrote an encyclopedia article about them.
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1983)462 U.S. 87
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 462 U.S. 87 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision that held valid a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rule that during the licensing of nuclear power plants, the permanent storage of nuclear waste should be assumed to have no environmental impact.
- BankAmerica Corp. v. United States (1983)462 U.S. 122
BankAmerica Corp v. United States, 462 U.S. 122 (1983) began in 1975. This is a landmark antitrust case which interprets Section 8 of the Clayton Act. The United States government brought test cases against three separate banks along with their parent holding companies, including mutual life insurance firms. The case also involved individuals who sat on the boards at both institutions. The case was decided by a 7–2 majority, with the Supreme Court reversing the Ninth Circuit. The defendants did not admit guilty. This case is an antitrust case that was filed by the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice claimed there were violations of the Clayton Act (Section 8), which prohibits individuals from serving on the boards of corporations that are separate and competing.
- Exxon Corporation v. Eagerton Exchange Oil and Gas Corporation (1983)462 U.S. 176
Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton, 462 U.S. 176 (1983), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld an Alabama law preventing oil and gas producers from passing on severance tax increases to consumers. The court ruled that the law was not in violation of the Contract Clause or the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This case arose when Exxon argued that the law passed by the state of Alabama was unconstitutional because it interfered with private contracts and treated companies like Exxon unfairly. The court ruled against Exxon arguing that states could create laws that affect contracts as long as they apply to the majority and served a public purpose.
- Illinois v. Gates (1983)Altered precedent462 U.S. 213
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983), is a Fourth Amendment case. Gates overruled Aguilar v. Texas and Spinelli v. United States, thereby replacing the Aguilar–Spinelli test for probable cause with the "totality of the circumstances" test.
- New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe (1983)462 U.S. 324
New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324 (1983), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the application of New Mexico's laws to on-reservation hunting and fishing by nonmembers of the Tribe is preempted by the operation of federal law.
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. (1983)Overruled (1992)462 U.S. 416
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed its abortion rights jurisprudence. In a majority opinion by Lewis F. Powell Jr., the Court struck down several provisions of an abortion law of Akron, Ohio, including portions found to be unconstitutionally vague.
Overruled by Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) - United States v. Place (1983)462 U.S. 696
United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for a trained police dog to sniff a person's luggage or property in a public place.
- Karcher v. Daggett (1983)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional462 U.S. 725
Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the legality of redistricting, and possibly gerrymandering, in the state of New Jersey.
- Zant v. Stephens (1983)462 U.S. 862
Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that aggravating circumstances in the death penalty context must meaningfully narrow the number of people eligible for the death penalty. As long as a defendant does have an aggravating circumstance, it does not matter if the one actually cited to justify the death penalty in their case is set aside.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983)Held federal statute unconstitutional462 U.S. 919
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the one-house legislative veto violated the constitutional separation of powers.
- Oregon v. Bradshaw (1983)462 U.S. 1039
Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039 (1983), applied the rule first announced in Edwards v. Arizona (1981) and clarified the manner in which a suspect may waive his right under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) to have counsel present during interrogation by the police.
- Morris v. Slappy (1983)461 U.S. 1
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 461 of the United States Reports:
- City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983)461 U.S. 95
City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the plaintiff, Adolph Lyons, lacked standing to challenge the Los Angeles city police department's use of chokeholds.
- Connick v. Myers (1983)461 U.S. 138
Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the First Amendment rights of public employees who speak on matters of possible public concern within the workplace context. It was first brought by Sheila Myers, an Orleans Parish, Louisiana, assistant district attorney (ADA). She had been fired by her superior, District Attorney Harry Connick Sr., when, after receiving a transfer she had fiercely resisted in private conversations with him and his chief assistant district attorney, she distributed a questionnaire to her fellow prosecutors asking about their experience with Connick's management practices.
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission (1983)461 U.S. 190
In Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission, 461 U.S. 190 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that a state statute regulating economic aspects of nuclear generating plants was not preempted by the federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954. The case provides a framework that has guided other cases involving preemption of federal authority.
- Olim v. Wakinekona (1983)461 U.S. 238
Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that incarcerated people do not have a due process right to choose the prison in which they are held, even if they are transferred to a prison across the ocean.
- Commissioner v. Tufts (1983)461 U.S. 300
Commissioner v. Tufts, 461 U.S. 300 (1983), was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that when a taxpayer sells or disposes of property encumbered by a nonrecourse obligation exceeding the fair market value of the property sold, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may require him to include in the “amount realized” the outstanding amount of the obligation; the fair market value of the property is irrelevant to this calculation.
- Kolender v. Lawson (1983)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional461 U.S. 352
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of vague laws that allow police to demand that "loiterers" and "wanderers" provide "credible and reliable" identification.
- Heckler v. Campbell (1983)461 U.S. 458
Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services could rely on published medical-vocational guidelines to determine a claimant’s right to Social Security benefits.
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington (1983)461 U.S. 540
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington, 461 U.S. 540 (1983), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld lobbying restrictions imposed on tax-exempt non-profit corporations.
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars (1983)461 U.S. 555
United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, is a United States Supreme Court case regarding civil forfeiture and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
- Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)Altered precedent461 U.S. 574
Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the religion clauses of the First Amendment did not prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from revoking the tax exempt status of a religious university whose practices are contrary to a compelling government public policy, such as eradicating racial discrimination.
- Bearden v. Georgia (1983)461 U.S. 660
Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case holding that a local government can only imprison or jail someone for not paying a fine if it can be shown, by means of a hearing, that the person in question could have paid it but "willfully" chose not to do so.
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1983)461 U.S. 956
Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc., 670 F.2d 760 (7th Cir. 1982) is a US labor law decision of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the award of attorney's fees in a discrimination lawsuit. The facts of the case involved allegedly discriminatory practices in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The litigants of the case settled in favor of the plaintiffs, but brought the issue of reasonable attorney's fees to the district court.
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. (1983)460 U.S. 1
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1 (1983), commonly cited as Moses Cone or Cone Hospital, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning civil procedure, specifically the abstention doctrine, as it applies to enforcing an arbitration clause in a diversity case. By a 6–3 margin, the justices resolved a complicated construction dispute by ruling that a North Carolina hospital had to arbitrate a claim against the Alabama-based company it had hired to build a new wing, even though it meant that it could not consolidate it with ongoing litigation it had brought in state court against the contractor and architect.
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n (1983)460 U.S. 37
Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association, 460 U.S. 37 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning free speech rights on government-owned property. The Court ruled that teacher mailboxes and the use of a school mail delivery system are a nonpublic forum, and upheld a policy that allowed the union representing the teachers, but not other employee organizations, to use the district's mail system.
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming (1983)460 U.S. 226
EEOC v. Wyoming, 460 U.S. 226 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case about forcible retirement of an employee of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. The court held the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any employee or potential employee between the ages of 40 and 70 on the basis of age, except "where age is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business. or where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age." The EEOC was represented by Solicitor General Rex E. Lee.
- United States v. Knotts (1983)460 U.S. 276
United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination. The Court unanimously held that since the use of such a device did not violate a legitimate expectation of privacy there was no search and seizure and thus the use was allowed without a warrant. It reasoned that a person traveling in public has no expectation of privacy in one's movements.
- Briscoe v. W (1983)460 U.S. 325
Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 did not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial. In other words, police officers have absolute immunity from civil liability for lying on the stand in criminal cases. Officers may still theoretically be criminally liable for perjury, and the Court's reasoning was based on that liability sufficing as a deterrent, but that means the complaint cannot come from the person who faced the harm. The objection must come from agents of the state.
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (1983)460 U.S. 462
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure known as the Rooker-Feldman doctrine (also named for the earlier case of Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.). The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions.
- Florida v. Royer (1983)460 U.S. 491
Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983), was a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with issues involving the Fourth Amendment. Specifically, the case establishes a firm line in cases where police conduct search and seizure without a warrant. The court ruled that, while it is legal for authorities to target and approach a person based on their behavior, absent more, they cannot detain or search such individual without a warrant.
- Minneapolis Star and Tribune Company v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue (1983)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional460 U.S. 575
Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983), was an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor overturning a use tax on paper and ink in excess of $100,000 consumed in any calendar year. The Minneapolis Star Tribune initially paid the tax and sued for a refund.
- Metropolitan Edison Company v. National Labor Relations Board (1983)460 U.S. 693
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. NLRB, 460 U.S. 693 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, when punishing an employee for engaging in an unprotected strike, an employer may not consider their status as a union official when deciding the degree of discipline to inflict but may consider their role in the actual strike.
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy (1983)460 U.S. 766
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy, 460 U.S. 766 (1983), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.
- Anderson v. Celebrezze (1983)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional460 U.S. 780
Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Ohio's filing deadline for independent candidates was unconstitutional.
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. (1983)459 U.S. 400
Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400 (1983), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision interpreting the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court upheld the Kansas Natural Gas Price Protection Act, finding that it did not unconstitutionally interfere with existing private contracts.
- South Dakota v. Neville (1983)459 U.S. 553
South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prosecutors may use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test as evidence of guilt and that the introduction of such evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
- Buttrum v. Georgia (1983)459 U.S. 1156
Menora v. Illinois High School Association, 683 F.2d 1030 (7th Cir. 1982), is a case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit centered on two Jewish schools seeking to play in an interscholastic basketball tournament run by the Illinois High School Association (IHSA). The IHSA would not let the schools compete unless their students removed their religious head-coverings, called kippot (sg. kippah). The kippot violated a rule against players wearing headgear on the court, according to the IHSA, but the students refused to play without them. They, along with their parents and schools, sued the IHSA in 1981, arguing that their First Amendment right of freedom of religion had been violated.
- Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio) (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional459 U.S. 87
Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee, 459 U.S. 87 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with political speech, and whether a state could require a minor political party to disclose its membership, expenditures, and contributors.
- Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional459 U.S. 116
Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the enforcement of liquor laws by a non-government entity. Massachusetts had established a law that allowed any church or school located within 500 feet (150 m) of an establishment seeking a liquor license to object to that license. The Supreme Court, in an 8–1 decision, ruled that Massachusetts' law violated the Establishment Clause as it delegated powers normally reserved to the government to non-government entities and would allow decisions to be made along religious lines, effectively advancing religious purposes.
- Toll v. Moreno (1982)458 U.S. 1
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 458 of the United States Reports:
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. (1982)Held federal statute unconstitutional458 U.S. 50
Northern Pipeline Construction Company v. Marathon Pipe Line Company, 458 U.S. 50 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Article III jurisdiction could not be conferred on non-Article III courts (i.e. courts without the independence and protection given to Article III judges).
- Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley (1982)458 U.S. 176
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the interpretation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Amy Rowley was a deaf student, whose school refused to provide a sign language interpreter. Her parents filed suit contending violation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. In a 6–3 decision authored by Justice Rehnquist, the Court held that public schools are not required by law to provide sign language interpreters to deaf students who are otherwise receiving an equal and adequate education.
- Asarco Incorporated v. Idaho State Tax Commission (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional458 U.S. 307
ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho Tax Commission, 458 U.S. 307 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, in a state's calculation of income tax for a corporation from another state, the state cannot include income from the intangible assets of subsidiary corporations that have on connection with the state.
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional458 U.S. 419
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that when the character of the governmental action is a permanent physical occupation of property, the government actions effects regulatory taking to the extent of the occupation, without regard to whether the action achieves an important public benefit or has only minimal economic impact on the owner. In doing so, it established the permanent physical presence test for regulatory takings.
- Rogers v. Lodge (1982)Held municipal or local ordinance unconstitutional458 U.S. 613
Rogers v. Lodge, 458 U.S. 613 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an at-large election system for a large rural county with a large black population violated the Equal Protection Clause.
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co. (1982)458 U.S. 654
Rice v. Norman Williams Co., 458 U.S. 654 (1982), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court involving the preemption of state law by the Sherman Act. The Supreme Court held, in a 9–0 decision, that the Sherman Act did not invalidate a California law prohibiting the importing of spirits not authorized by the brand owner.
- Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional458 U.S. 718
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (1982), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, decided 5–4, which ruled that the single-sex admissions policy of the Mississippi University for Women violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
- New York v. Ferber (1982)458 U.S. 747
New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), is a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not protect the sale or manufacture of child sexual abuse material (also known as child pornography) and that states could outlaw it.
- Enmund v. Florida (1982)Held state or territorial law unconstitutional458 U.S. 782
Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case. It was a 5–4 decision in which the United States Supreme Court applied its capital proportionality principle, to set aside the death penalty for the driver of a getaway car, in a robbery-murder of an elderly Floridian couple. The court ruled that the imposition of the death penalty under the felony murder rule when the defendant did not intentionally kill the victim constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the United States constitution.