¶11. On the trial of a claim interposed to the levy of a mortgage fi. fa., there was ho error in admitting in evidence the rule nisi and rule absoluto, as recorded on the minutes of the court where the trial was had.
¶22. The claimant having bought with full knowledge of the mortgage lien and having agreed to pay.it, a verdict subjecting the property was required by evidence.
¶3Judgment afiirmed.