Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 U.S. 415

Oswald v. New-York

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February Term, 1793.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1793-02

PROCLAMATION was made in this Ujjufe, “ that any perfon. having authority to appear for the State of New-Tori is required to appear accordingly j’? and noperfon appearing it was ordered, on motion of Cone for the Plaintiff,

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Stay/motion granted · 4–1 · Decided 1793-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1985

1 district · 4 state decisions

3017931800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PROCLAMATION was made in this Ujjufe, “ that any perfon. having authority to appear for the State of New-Tori is required to appear accordingly j’? and noperfon appearing it was ordered, on motion of Cone for the Plaintiff,

¶2By the Court

¶3:—Unlefs the State appears by the firft day of next Term to the above fuit, or iliew caufe to the contrary, judgment will be entered by default againft the faid ftate.*

/2/us/415 · .json · Public domain