Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 N.J.L. 257

James v. Dickson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1794

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1794-11-15

THESE were two cases that came before the court on the return of a Certiorari to Justice Dickenson, before whom the plaintiff below had obtained judgment by default, for the amount of his demand. . , , , Y hv objection taken was that the bills given m evidence were; sealed bills, and therefore the actions were improperly brought in the name of the assignee.

Decided 1794-11-15

Per Curiam.

¶1Wo < i;pnot make any intendment to over» turn a judgment^ it mu a arlv appear to us that there was error, and in order to do thin, the facts which constitute the ground of objection must be proved throughout. It may be that these parties have made two notes bearing the same date, and for the same sums, without seals and sued upon them. — > We ought rather to intend this in support of the judgment.— The judgments must be affirmed with costs.

¶2Judgments affirmed,

/1/njl/257 · .json · Public domain