Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 N.J.L. 320

Patten v. Halsted

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 15, 1795

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1795-04-15

This was an action on the case against defendant as sheriff, for the escape of one Freeman.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1926

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1795-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Cur.

¶1Both the objections are unavailable on the present, occasion. The case from Kirby is inapplicable, because grounded on a special act of the legislature, which cannot be extended to this state. Until our own legislature change the common law in this particular, we must adopt it as the rule for our government; and by that the sheriff is answerable for an escape under circumstances like the present.

¶2The judgment also was the best possible proof that could have been produced ; it was conclusive against Freeman, and the sheriff can stand in no better a situation.

¶3Rule discharged.

/1/njl/320 · .json · Public domain