¶1We have given the evidence in this case a careful examination and consideration. The main contention is that of fraud in the transaction.
¶2This opened a wide door to the admission of evidence.
¶3There certainly was evidence tending to show the conveyance by Smith to Hofius was made and accepted with intent to defraud McNabb; and there is also sufficient evidence to submit to the jury that He Wolf was not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. The evidence was fairly submitted, and we see no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment.
¶4Judgment affirmed.