Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 U.S. 196

Chaplin v. Kirwan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided SEPTEMBER TERM, 1786.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1786-09

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1805

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1786-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Arbitrators.

¶2Referees have no right to examine a witness exporte.

¶3The referees in this case had allowed ex parte evidence to be given, of the current price of coachmakors’ work, at the time when the cause of action accrued. For this reason, the defendant moved to set aside their report. And—

¶4By the Court.

¶5If referees make inquiries abroad, to ascertain for their own satisfaction, the price of work, or the truth of any other matter, which may be said, comparatively, to be of a public nature, this, so far from being irregular, would be highly commendable. But it is a very different case, when they proceed separately to examine a witness, who has been produced by one of the parties, although the evidence relates only to those general points. The adverse parties should have an opportunity of cross-examining the witness, (a)

¶6The report set aside.

/1/us/196 · .json · Public domain