Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 U.S. 208

Shoemaker v. Knorr

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1787-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Baker ex rel. Hazlehurst v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1787-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1943

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2017871790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Amendment.

¶2The teste and return of an alias venditioni exponas were allowed to be amended by the praecipe.

¶3Judgment : fi.fa. returned, and vend. exp. to Dec. term 1786, returned by the sheriff, “ proceedings stayed by the plaintiff.” The sheriff afterward" made sale of the premises, and the plaintiff took a praecipe f rom his attorney, for an al. vend. exp. returnable to March term 1787, but before the return-day of the term, the sale had been made, although the praecipe was not delivered, and no writ made out until after the term, when the prothonotary, on the application of the sheriff, issued an alias vend. exp. returnable to June term.

¶4It was now moved to alter the teste and return, by the praidpe / that is, to make the writ returnable at March, instead of June term.

¶5*209Rawle, for the plaintiff;. Sergeant, for the defendant.

¶6Sergeant,

¶7the defendant’s attorney on record, did not oppose the motion, but declared, that as his authority was determined by the judgment, his consent could not be obligatory on his client.

¶8The Court, after some deliberation, granted leave to make the alteration moved for ; resting, it seemed, upon the ground that theprcecipe furnished something to amend by. (a)

/1/us/208 · .json · Public domain