Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 N.C. 572

Bain v. . Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1825

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1825-06-05

Fi’om Cabarrus. Wilson, at a former term, read an affidavit made by the defendant, setting forth that a verdict had been rendered against him, and that he had intended to move fora new trial, but was prevented by the following facts. Court adjourned on Friday of the term to meet on the morning of the next day at the hour of eight, but the Judge left the county on Saturday morning at six for his next court, and consequently defendant could not move for a new trial.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1826

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1825-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Let a certiorari issue as prayed for. And now, on the return of the writ at this term.

¶2The proceedings in this case appeared to have been very irregular. It seemed to have commenced in Cabarrus County court by a writ in case, and afterwards to have been amended by changing the writ (573) to debt; a verdict was returned for defendant in the county court and the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court, where the declaration was in case, and the jury found that the defendant did assume, and assessed plaintiff's damages to six dollars and a half-cent and costs. Plaintiff then made an affidavit that when suit was commenced his demand was just for more than $60, as it was also when the suit was tried, but that he had failed to establish it from the unexpected production of a witness whom he could have discredited; and judgment was rendered pursuant to the finding, whereupon there was an appeal to this Court. The declaration was for work and labor done, and for a judgment for $14 obtained before a justice of the peace.

/10/nc/572 · .json · Public domain