Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 100 SW3D 36 - Roberson v. State

Roberson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. State · Johnson v. State · Dinkins v. State · Motilla v. State · Solomon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• the source and nature of the error; • the extent to which the State emphasized it; • the probable collateral implications of the error; • the weight a juror would probably place upon it, giving consideration to whether the record contains “overwhelming evidence supporting the finding in question”; and • whether declaring the error harmless would encourage the State to repeat it with impunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “with any confidence that the persistence and flagrancy with which [the State] engaged in this inappropriate argument did not impact the punishment phase.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.