Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

101 A.3d 1149

Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2014

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2014-10-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2015

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-10-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is: *1150Did the Superior Court incorrectly interpret the Pennsylvania [RTFA] by requiring a jury trial to determine that the land application of biosolids falls within the Act’s definition of a “normal agricultural operation,” which was contrary to the Act and this Court’s precedent that statutes of repose and statutory interpretation present questions of law for resolution by courts, not juries?

/101/a3d/1149 · .json · Public domain