¶1Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (H. Bell, J.), rendered March 22, 1983, convicting defendant, after Bench trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law, § 265.03), is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, so as to reduce the conviction to a conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law, § 265.02, subd [4]), and the case is remitted to the Trial Term with the direction to sentence the defendant accordingly, and the judgment is otherwise affirmed. H On the facts of this case, the evidence does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant intended to use the pistol unlawfully against another. In this case the interest of justice will be better served by a conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Alexander, JJ.
101 A.D.2d 757
People v. Tejada
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 1984
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1984-05-10
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1996
1 district · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-05-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →