101 N.J.L. 232
127 A 164
Decided January 19, 1925
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1925-01-19
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-01-19
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1995
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Then chard, Parker, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van JBuskirk, Clark, McGle.nnon, Kays, JJ. 12.
¶3 For reversal — -None.