Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

101 N.J.L. 402

128 A 247

Hammel v. Van Sickle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1925

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1925-03-16

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2019

4 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam.

¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

¶2 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13.

¶3 For reversal — None.

/101/njl/402 · .json · Public domain