Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 SW3D 107 - Rylander v. State

Rylander v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

136
cited by 136 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

136 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Thompson v. State · Bone v. State · Mallett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]rial counsel should ordinarily be afforded an opportunity to explain his actions before being denounced as ineffective.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A vague, inarticulate sense that counsel could have provided a better defense is not a legal basis for finding counsel constitutionally incompetent.... [A] defendant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there is, in fact, no plausible professional reason for a specific act or omission.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “because the ineffective assistance claim is raised on direct appeal, trial counsel has not had an opportunity to respond to these areas of concern”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.