102 N.J.L. 222
130 A 919
Decided October 19, 1925
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1925-10-19
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-10-19
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1975
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — None.