Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

102 N.J.L. 224

130 A 920

State v. Katz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 19, 1925

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1925-10-19

Decided 1925-10-19

*225 Per Curiam.

¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

¶2 For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

¶3 For reversal — None.

/102/njl/224 · .json · Public domain