State v. LaMar’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 325 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 336 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Franklin v. Anderson (2006), State v. Keith (2008)
4 federal appellate · 325 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · State v. LaMar · State v. Winstead · State v. Reddick · State v. Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 336 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ohio and other states `may erect reasonable procedural requirements for triggering the right to an adjudication,' Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. (1982), 455 U.S. 422 , 437 , 102 S.Ct 1148 , 71 L.Ed 2d 265 , and that is what Ohio has done by *Page 4 creating a 90-day deadline for the filing of applications to reopen. Defendant could have retained new attorneys after the court of appeals issued its decision in 1994, or he could have filed the application on his own. What he could not do was ignore the rule's filing deadline. * * * The 90-day requirement in the rule is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.