103 N.J. 493
Decided March 25, 1986
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1986-03-25
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1999
6 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“limited solely to the defendant's sixth amendment claim that his right to counsel was violated by the post-indictment interrogation of defendant by representatives of the prosecutor. See, Comment to Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8, citing United States v. Callabrass, 458 F. Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 211 N.J. Super. 367 - State v. Darby
Relies on 458 F. Supp. 964 - United States v. Callabrass
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-03-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Petition for certification granted, limited solely to the defendant’s sixth amendment claim that his right to counsel was violated by the post-indictment interrogation of defendant by representatives of the prosecutor. See, Comment to Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8, citing United States v. Callabrass, 458 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.1978). The matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for its consideration of this issue.
¶2Jurisdiction is not retained.