103 N.J.L. 204
134 A 919
Decided October 18, 1926
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1926-10-18
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-10-18
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1996
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalish, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
¶3 For reversal — None.