103 N.J.L. 205
134 A 919
Decided October 18, 1926
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1926-10-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1930
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1926-10-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
¶3 For reversal — None.