103 N.J.L. 715
137 A 718
Decided March 24, 1927
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1927-03-24
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-03-24
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2005
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — -None.