State v. Gumm’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 365 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 372 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Tolliver v. Sheets (2010), Franklin v. Anderson (2006)
2 federal appellate · 365 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · State v. Gumm · State v. Winstead · State v. Reddick · State v. Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 372 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consistent enforcement of the rule's deadline by the appellate courts in Ohio protects on the one hand the state's legitimate interest in the finality of its judgments and ensures on the other hand that any claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are promptly examined and resolved.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment unless the applicant shows good cause for filing at a later time.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.