Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 Pa. 260

Murphy v. Chase

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1883

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1883-04-23

' Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne county : Of January Term 1883, No. 93. Replevin,, by Thomas Murphy against The Times Printing Association and A. A. Chase, to recover the possession of certain personal chattels levied on by the said Murphy, as executor of T. J. Walsh, deceased, and bought in by him at the constable’s sale.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1883-04-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1934

12 state decisions

40188318901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The opinion of the court was filed

Pee Cueiam.

¶2It must be conceded that the court erre.d in permitting the plea of abatement to be added during the trial of the cause. It was too late in time and defective in form. The plaintiff, however, was not injured thereby.

¶3The general rule is that an officer of the law is presumed to have done his duty. So, when a public officer has done an act which should be preceded by certain preliminary steps, it will be presumed they were taken. All. these presumptions, however, must-be limited, to his acts as an officer. They do not apply to his precedent acts done as an agent. Hence in this case it was incumbent on the plaintiff to prove that notice of *263the distress with the cause of such taking was given to the^tenant before the appraisement was made. Having wholly failed to prove this, the sale was invalid.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

/103/pa/260 · .json · Public domain