104 F. Supp. 2d 1237 - Lum v. Vision Service Plan’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 631 (Business Opportunity Development Reform Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396O (§ 1916 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · McKinney v. Baldwin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.