104 N.J.L. 186
138 A 923
Decided October 17, 1927
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1927-10-17
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1951
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-10-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — Paeiiee, Kalisch, Black, Katzekbach, •Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlenmon, Kays, IIeteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
¶3 For reversal — None.