104 N.J.L. 431
140 A 918
Decided February 6, 1928
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1928-02-06
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1960
1 district · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-02-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trehchard, Parker, Black, Campbell, White, Yah Buskirk, McGlehkok, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — None.