104 N.J.L. 446
146 A 927
Decided February 6, 1928
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1928-02-06
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-02-06
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 1986
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chiee Justice, Teenchabd, Mintuen, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — -None.