105 N.J.L. 252
143 A 920
Decided October 15, 1928
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1928-10-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1948
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
¶3 For reversal — None.